A little historical context about witchcraft and magic around the time of Macbeth, just in time to get you in the mood for Halloween!Read More
As anyone in theatre world probably knows, Macbeth isn’t supposed to be mentioned inside a theatre, which is why it’s often called “The Scottish Play” or other nicknames (here at Shakespearemachine we usually prefer “Mackers”). If you say the name in the theatre, you have to leave the building, spin around three times, spit over your left shoulder, and either cursing or say a line from a different Shakespeare play before knocking to get back in. Otherwise, bad luck will befall either the speaker and the theatre in general.
We tend to believe in the superstition; during our director’s pre-show speech before Faustus back in January, when he announced this fall’s performance of Macbeth, those of us in the cast collectively shuddered backstage every night. And we have indeed had our share of bad luck, which seems to indicate that we should take a “better-safe-than-sorry” standpoint and avoid the name just in case.
But, like, how cursed is it, really?
First of all, supposedly “cursed” past incidents include:
- The actor playing Duncan in a 17th-century performance in Amsterdam accidentally being killed with a real dagger instead of a prop
- Harold Norman, an actor playing Macbeth in 1947, getting killed onstage during a combat scene
- A falling stage weight nearly killing famed actor Laurence Olivier by inches when he took the lead role in 1937
- A show directed by John Gielgud in 1942 ending up with a real-life body count of three: Duncan and two of the witches
- The Astor Place Riots between two rival performances of Macbeth in New York in 1948, killing at least 22 people and injuring over 100 (listen to the genuinely interesting episode about this incident from the Folger's "Shakespeare Unlimited" podcast here)
So not a great track record, overall. The History Channel relays the rumor that the whole “curse” thing all started when the play was first performed in 1606 and the actor meant to play Lady Macbeth suddenly died, forcing Shakespeare to play the part himself.
Some people believe that because Shakespeare incorporated real spells into the Weird Sisters’ dialogue and real ingredients into their potions, he brought the curse upon the play himself, whether intentionally or unintentionally. Some people believe that witches “cursed the play for eternity” in revenge for portraying them so wickedly, according to the Telegraph. Belief in witchcraft WAS big back then, after all (to find out more, keep your eye out for our spooky Halloween post in a few months).
However, in Paul Menzer’s Anecdotal Shakespeare (a new performance history out from Arden Shakespeare), he explains that despite the misfortunes that might have occurred during performances of Macbeth, there is no historical evidence of anyone mentioning a “curse” or surrounding superstition for almost 300 years into its performance history. Any theatrical mishaps that occurred during Macbeth productions are instead just called “accidents.”
Plenty of reports of these incidents had the chance to bring up the “curse,” and yet none of them did. This points to the conclusion that Macbeth wasn’t a specifically unlucky play; it was just a play that was performed a lot because of its popularity, so it would naturally end up having more tragic incidents occur in conjunction with it. Paul Menzer goes into much greater detail about the supposed origins of the curse and all of its fun anecdotes, so check out his book here if you want to learn more.
No reality behind the superstition, then; just tradition. But who can blame people for concocting this mysterious curse? After all, Macbeth is a spooky play, full of witchcraft and ghosts and mystically-appearing daggers. The fact that this superstition (probably) isn’t real doesn’t ruin the fun.
Do you believe in the curse? Tweet us @shakesmachineFW let us know. Special shoutout to the Hurly Burly Shakespeare Show, a fabulous podcast hosted by Aubrey Whitlock and Jess Hamlet, for introducing us to Paul Menzer’s book and their fantastic discussion of the curse in general. Check out their episode on Macbeth here.
And look forward to September, when we start getting into Macbeth rehearsals! We can't wait to start posting interviews with the cast and behind-the-scenes fun. Thanks for reading!
In our last Shakes-in-context blog post, we wrote about the Great Chain of Being and how, in the play Macbeth, the Chain is disturbed by Macbeth murdering the rightful king and blaming the king’s son, leaving Macbeth to rule over Scotland. Historically speaking, this is actually only partly true. The real Macbeth, from 11th century Scotland, is not much like Shakespeare’s version. Shakespeare learned most of his information about Macbeth from Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland, which might have been the cause of some of the discrepancies (also, he had poetic license to change whatever he wanted, really). Read on to learn more about the REAL Macbeth.Read More
Who’s ready for some double-double-toil-and-trouble?? As we begin the trek towards our production of Macbeth in November, we’re going to highlight some fun contextual facts and historical ideas related thematically to the show. Each month will focus on a new idea related to our favorite Scottish murderer, and this month’s topic is one that relates to a number of Shakespeare’s plays: the Great Chain of Being.Read More